J'ai aussi un 4 ème argument, avec la peine de mort on n'aurait plus besoin de payer une fortune pour construire des prisons et donc notre pays serait moins pauvre.
A comment done by an user
1: Yes and NO! If a death sentence is applied immediately after 1 day, how could this reduce crimes?
All people who wish to do suicide/euthanasia, but is not allowed almost everywhere due to shitty laws, would do terrorism so they could get vip suicide ...
So the answer is: immediate death sentence as vip suicide ticket!
https://t.me/LawsTelegram/29
but yes, in complex cases like Dahmer. A cannibal could already get an execution after few weeks or months, to keep other prisoners safe!
https://t.me/HumanRightAbuse/52
https://t.me/HumanRightAbuse/53
From a scientific point IS NOT POSSIBLE TO SAY if less crimes are done, or less crimes without death sentence!
https://t.me/AmnestyBullshit/460
All people talking about such things just say BULLSHIT! We cannot answer that, because it's impossible to answer that!
https://t.me/DefenceTelegram/561
https://t.me/AmnestyBullshit
But if someone could get a @AnimalAbuseDeathSentence for animal torture, knowing he would not get a vip suicide!, maybe he thinks twice before doing that.
No matter, we cannot say there will be less or more, since it's impossible to say that!! It's huge complex, because every crime is different too!!!
2: we already talked on
https://t.me/RecidivismFacts
and we already said that we don't need to forget human rights of the population!
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights
RECIDIVISM ARE HUGE HIGH! and even underevaluated! plus let we consider even the type of the crime and prison escapes ..
3: it's not the point of a death sentence! You don't need to kill for making victims happy! You need to kill, to keep them safe. So here we don't agree at all!
4: Yes, we already wrote multiple times!
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/66
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/67
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/137
https://t.me/HumanRightAbuse
