🤦♂️ ... Amnesty is never happy ... Part 2
Part 1
https://t.me/DefenceTelegram
So already applying a death sentence after 20-30 years to be honest is shit! This should be applied immediately with 100% proof to really keep society safe and even keep costs low ..., BUT again
1) no vip suicide! = so no motivation to do crimes for vip suicide!
2) prisoners still need to reflect!
- no death sentence: "all is fine ... just keep it short and with rehabilitation if possible" WHEN IN REALITY
a) some prisoner NEED to remain in prison forever! = mio of dollars for each prisoner!
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights
b) some of such prisoners did suicide
https://t.me/DefenceTelegram
c) other wish to die, but have no courage to do suicide! so they would be happy to get a death sentence instead of a life sentence ...
d) rehabilitation of people like Breivik is not just IMPOSSIBLE, but cost a lot of money! because you need to keep such prisoners separated from others!
https://t.me/PrisonerParole
and so this influence even the ability to do rehabilitation ... near the fact that he did a racial terror attack ...
So rehabilitation yes for normal crimes ... but NO for serious complex crimes!
Obviously Amnesty just merge all things as one ... like governments do too!
https://t.me/LawsTelegram
https://t.me/LawsTelegram
e) what we wrote previously
https://t.me/DefenceTelegram about d) e)
or about terrorism
https://t.me/IsraelWarWomenRights
Plus let we remember how Amnesty is acting:
a) no science with bullshit
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ
b) not covering all topics
https://t.me/DefenceTelegram
c) just share one point of view, without considering both human rights
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights
We instead share pro and contra! even if we are in part pro death sentence and in part against that ... because IT DEPENDS!
Example? We even shared recidivism about a study done in Suomi, which is not really "supporting that"
https://t.me/DefenceTelegram
